The two superpowers went head-to-head in a worldwide survey, recently published by the Pew Research Center. Comparisons in the survey included perceptions of global image, world power, ways of doing business, popular culture, political views, individual rights, science and military threat, among others.
China’s economic power is on the rise, and many think it will eventually supplant the United States as the world’s dominant superpower.
Not surprisingly, attitudes towards the U.S. and China varied significantly by region:
The survey also finds rising tensions between the American and Chinese publics:
For more details, the full 132-page report may be downloaded from the Pew Research Center at the following link:
The report above is shared courtesy of Ray Hays, Member of Arizona District Export Council.
A couple years ago, this blog featured the following articles on the trend of international franchises targeting the U.S. market:
A new Entrepreneur Magazine article studies this new trend, some examples of foreign franchisors in the U.S. market, and the barriers to entry to for international franchises wishing to launch into the U.S. market. The article quotes Ray Hays, author of this blog, in addition to franchise owners involved in this trend.
On February 28, 2013, Daniel Ogden, Chairman of the National District Export Council, testified before Congress during a hearing of the House Small Business Trade Subcommittee on the development by the 113th Congress of a small business trade agenda.
In the Testimony, Daniel Ogden provides a comparison of U.S. federal export assistance programs with government-funded export assistance in other large exporting countries. Highlights include:
Ogden’s testimony also includes several useful facts on US export assistance including:
Click here for a PDF copy of the Testimony Transcript, or see the Testimony video below. (Testimony starts at time marker 8:55.)
For more information on the National District Export Council, please refer to their website at http://www.districtexportcouncil.com.
Re-blogged courtesy of Ray Hays, Member of the Arizona District Export Council
Few would dispute that China is a formidable competitor in the global arena. The growth of the trade deficit between the U.S. and China is a testimony to China’s success.
In the last two decades, the U.S.-China trade deficit ballooned from $10 billion to $273 billion. Toys to televisions, few U.S. or European manufacturers can compete with the economic advantages of Chinese production and labor.
Yet in the global economy, China has a competitive weakness that sits in plain sight: brand equity.
A quick 20-second Quiz:
Easy, right? Now let’s try the same quiz… again, in 20 seconds:
How did you do? Unless you are Chinese, (and maybe even if you are Chinese), the second quiz is much more difficult, correct?
Now, expand this list to most branded products… Unless you’re thinking of martial arts superstars or very long walls, China simply falls short on brand recognition. If you are from Asia, you may know several Chinese brands, but on the global stage, China has failed to become a true brand competitor.
Successful branding is one of the reasons why American brands sell so well. Of course, Japan, Germany, France and other countries have great brands… Sony, BMW, Christian Dior. However, I would argue that in today’s global market United States is still the world’s powerhouse of branded products.
Right now, I’m in my office looking at two computer screens, with the brand names of Dell and Magnavox, a printer branded HP, a wireless router branded Cisco… Yes, I know what you are thinking: Then I look at the little label on the back, and yes, every single one of these items is “Made in China.” All of these products are Chinese-made, but they are American-branded. So are they Chinese products or American products? How much value does the American brand really add to the product?
Ask yourself, as a consumer from the U.S., Europe, Latin America, etc… Would you rather purchase a wireless router branded Huawei or Cisco? Never heard of Huawei? It’s the largest brand of computer router in China… and yes, many tech people might know and trust this brand, but not the average American or European consumer.
Imagine that you are at your local electronics store, and you want to buy a wireless router. The sales person says, “This Huawei router and this Cisco router have the exact same technical specifications and the same price.”
Which router would you buy? I’d guess 95% of you would buy the Cisco router. Okay, the sales person offers to reduce the price of the Huawei router by 10%. Would you buy it now? Okay, 20% off the Huawei router. Would you buy it now? Eventually, a typical American or European consumer might consider the Huawei router… but at what discount?
In short, the difference in selling price represents brand value or brand equity of the competing products. Brand is a matter of marketing. Brand is a matter of perception. Brand is a matter of purchasing decisions. Brand is a matter of global competition. In this regard, China is far behind the U.S., Europe and Japan.
While American and European companies rely on inexpensive Chinese labor to produce our products, China relies on American and European brands to sell the products.
Ponder these questions:
To be clear, I believe that China is a very respectable competitor in global trade. I believe that China produces some of the world’s finest products. (My mother only brought out the fine china porcelain plates on special occasions.) For many centuries, the Chinese demonstrated leadership in global commerce, long before the rise of large-scale European or American foreign trade.
That said, if China wishes to truly dominate today’s world economy, it must first win the global battle of the brands. This will be a tough battle indeed.